Living specs for coding agents
In minutes, organize briefs, decisions, and technical context into an approved pact. Connect your repository and implement in your IDE with your preferred coding agent.
Set a minimum installment amount of R$ 50
Customers can split purchases over R$ 300 into up to 6 interest-free payments, respecting the per-installment floor.
Show installment simulation before confirmation
Shows the total, number of installments, and amount of each installment before the customer completes payment.
Block installments on prepaid cards
The system identifies card type via BIN and only allows installments on traditional credit cards.
Record installment history per customer
Each split purchase creates a log with the customer ID, total amount, number of installments, and charge status.
New sprint, new scope, old specs.
Requirements evolve every sprint. Updating specs, measuring impact, reviewing with the team, and re-approving with the stakeholder takes more time than it should. And when the process is manual, something always slips through.
Invisible rework
The requirement evolved, but the spec did not. The developer ships based on what they had. During review, they discover it needs adjustment. One more round, one more week.
Invisible impact
The scope changed and 12 specs may be out of date. Which ones? Only a one-by-one review can tell. Time no one has mid-sprint.
A cost no one measures
Every outdated spec becomes rework. Every rework becomes delay. Every delay costs a sprint, a team, and a delivery. The cost is there, but no one sees the total.
Every developer, a different standard
Cursor rules, templates, prompts, guidelines. Every developer builds their own kit. No one follows the same process. The result is inconsistent code and quality that varies from person to person.
From messy brief to approved spec in hours, not weeks
teoai organizes project context, identifies modules, maps dependencies, and structures specs with criteria and business rules. Built by people who live the day-to-day of technology teams.
Upload the brief
teoai organizes features, actors, and dependencies from text, documents, and call transcripts.
Validate the structure
Review the structure generated by teoai. Adjust priorities, resolve open questions, and refine criteria. All in a visual editor.
Send it to the stakeholder
Invite them by email; they only need to accept. It works in the browser. The stakeholder reads clear language and approves or rejects each spec.
Connect your repository and IDE
Connect teoai to your repository via MCP and access specs, decisions, and context directly in your IDE. Use your preferred agent to implement against the approved pact.
You choose the engine. teoai governs the context.
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and Windsurf keep executing code. teoai sits between brief, decision, and execution: it keeps a living, approved, traceable spec so any agent can work from the same pact.
Executes better with reliable context
An agent accelerates implementation, but it responds to the prompt of the moment. If the spec is incomplete, outdated, or missing a recorded decision, the delivery inherits that misalignment.
A governance harness for agents
teoai leads briefing, review, approval, and versioning. The agent receives a living spec with criteria, dependencies, decisions, and artifact lineage through a direct context connection.
Works from a pact that follows delivery
Tech Leads, PMs, stakeholders, and developers stop negotiating context in Slack, tickets, and meetings. The approved decision becomes an operational reference for the people writing code.
Inside teoai
A product rail for coding agents
Not autocomplete. teoai organizes project context, understands relationships between modules, identifies dependencies, and maintains specs a Tech Lead would review, not rewrite.
Automatic impact across versions
Did the scope change? teoai compares it with the previous version and shows impact, lineage, and artifacts affected by each spec. No spreadsheet, no one-by-one review.
Connect context to the agent your team already uses
teoai does not compete with your agent. It governs approved specs, prototypes, and rules so Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Windsurf, or VS Code can access the same context through MCP.
Approval flow with history
Draft, Review, Pending, Approved, Released. Each stage has an owner, date, decision, and version. The approved pact follows delivery.
Approved context inside Cursor
Main and alternate flows, acceptance criteria, business rules, and resolved questions with recorded decisions. The agent accesses live context without relying on a loose prompt or outdated document.
Context and dependencies in one place
Acceptance criteria, business rules, alternate flows, dependencies, and decisions already made. Developers know what must be ready, in the right order, with no surprises mid-sprint.
teoai/context + teoai/depsDirect access through MCP
Connect Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode to teoai. Specs, prototypes, and business rules arrive as approved context, directly in the implementation flow.
teoai/ideStart coding in minutes
Plan, context, and approved decisions are accessible to the agent. No waiting for alignment, searching Slack for context, or rebuilding requirements in a prompt.
teoai/startApprove what will be built. In the browser, on your time.
Invite them by email; they only need to accept. It works in the browser. Read requirements in clear language, approve or reject each spec with comments. Everything is recorded.
- 01Email invite, no frictionThe stakeholder receives an invitation, accepts it, and accesses everything in the browser. No installation.
- 02Clear language, no technical termsSpecs translated into business language. No developer jargon, no mental translation.
- 03Approve each spec with historyEvery approval is recorded with a date, comment, and version. Auditable from start to finish.
Fixed installment payment split
As a checkout customer,
I want to split purchases over R$ 300 into up to 6 interest-free payments,
so that I can buy larger items without compromising my monthly budget.
The product evolves. The brief changes. teoai keeps up.
teoai maps modules, structures specs with criteria and business rules, detects the impact of every change, and keeps leadership, product, engineering, and stakeholders on the same page. IDEs and agents need reliable context. Task managers organize work, not specifications. teoai is the governance layer that reviews, approves, and delivers a living plan for execution.
It's not another management tool. It's the layer that governs your tools.
teoai sits between brief, decision, and execution. It creates the pact that agents, IDEs, and task managers need to consume.
Great at execution, fragile when context changes
Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode accelerate production, but they do not solve approval, versioning, and requirements traceability on their own.
- They respond to the current prompt.
- They do not preserve the business pact.
- They depend on the quality of the spec they receive.
A governance harness for any agent
teoai maintains a living spec, artifact lineage, approved decisions, and impact across versions. The code engine can change; approved context remains.
- Carries the approved pact into execution.
- Shows impact by version, spec, and artifact.
- Creates traceability before the pull request.
Organizes work, but does not specify the product
Jira, Linear, and similar tools help prioritize and track tasks. teoai prepares the plan and technical context those tools reference and agents use to implement.
- A ticket does not replace a spec.
- Status does not replace approval.
- A backlog does not replace live context.
A few questions you may have
01What does teoai do?
teoai takes client briefs (text, documents, call transcripts) and turns them into living specs with acceptance criteria, business rules, dependencies, and traceable decisions. Specs go through review and approval before feeding coding agents.
02Does teoai replace Jira or Linear?
No. teoai is not a task manager. It works before and during execution: it turns input into approved specs, tracks impact across versions, and connects context to the repository, IDE, and the agent your team already uses.
03How does a stakeholder access it?
Invite them by email. They accept the invitation and access everything directly in the browser. They read specs in clear language and approve or reject with comments.
04How does the agent access context?
The primary route is a direct MCP connection to the repository and development environment. For documentation and review, the team can also use outputs such as Markdown and PDF.
05Does it work for existing projects or only new ones?
Both. The flow is the same: upload the brief, teoai organizes the content, and you validate what was generated. For existing projects, automatic comparison shows the impact of changes on specs that were already in place.
Ready to deliver with clarity from the brief?We received your email.
teoai is in early access. Join the list to test living specs, approval, traceability, and direct connection to your development environment.Your email was added to the early access list.
Join the Advisory BoardWe received your email.
Help define how teams govern coding agents with living specs, artifact lineage, change impact, and decisions approved before implementation.We registered your interest. Open the prepared message to talk directly with us.
- For CTOs, Heads of Engineering, and technical leaders.
- Direct conversations about governance, agents, and delivery quality.
- Influence the roadmap before broad product access.